Paul Sellers argues that investing in high-demand, hand-tool skills offers lifelong returns—better health, deeper satisfaction, and true self-reliance—so he avoids machines even after six decades of daily woodworking. He reframes “cost” to include more than money, suggesting that time and practice may demand more upfront but deliver greater long-term value in capability and well-being.
What trade-offs have you made between convenience and mastery—have you chosen a slower, skill-building approach over a faster, machine- or tech-driven one, and what did you gain or lose?
High-demand skills will ultimately change your life for good, and that is why I used hand tools for 98% of my work for almost 61 years of daily woodworking, and why I decline to use machines. Better health and a sense of achievement makes me feel not just marginally good about myself but great, and...