The biggest regret I’ve seen isn’t usually outright undersizing - it’s locking in inflexibility.
Undersized equipment is obvious once volumes grow. But limited flexibility and poor integration hide longer. A machine might technically meet spec, yet struggle with new SKUs, faster changeovers, or upstream/downstream variation.
What hurts most over time:
Transfer points that weren’t stress-tested for peak flow
Controls that don’t talk cleanly across the line
Designs optimized for today’s product mix, not tomorrow’s
Earlier in my career, I focused heavily on rated capacity and upfront cost. Now I look harder at:
Changeover time under real conditions (not brochure numbers)
Control architecture and data access
Physical layout for future expansion
Vendor mindset - are they solving for the system, or just their machine?
“Good enough” on paper can become expensive friction in a growth phase.
Curious to hear how others weigh flexibility vs capital constraints when leadership wants ROI yesterday.
Curious to hear how others weigh flexibility vs capital constraints when leadership wants ROI yesterday.