Invite People

Share 4Engineers with your friends and help them get started!

Emails
Enter multiple email addresses by separating it with a comma.
Back
4Engineers

Why are we destroying a perfectly good table?!

This article was originally posted on The Wood Whisperer.
Summary
Summary: Marc and Jason revisit a mid-century modern dining table they built years ago and “destroy” it to fix practical issues for a family of four: the splayed legs limited seating and led to knee bumps. They perform a slight redesign to improve functionality while reusing nearly all original materials (adding only two new rails) and switch the finish from Rubio to Sherwin-Williams Pre-Catalyzed Lacquer.

Question: When a design looks great but isn’t family-friendly, would you preserve the original aesthetic or rework it for function—and what finish would you pick for everyday durability?

Several years ago Jason and I made a dining table. Original Mid-Century Modern Table.
While there’s technically nothing wrong with the original design, the mid-century modern styling brings with it a few challenges for a busy family of four. Because the legs spread out, it limits the overall seating capacity and anyone sitting near the end of the long side will occasionally bang their knee. So we set out to alleviate these problems with a slight re-design, using as much of the original table as possible. The new version of the table is much more functional for Jason’s family and aside from two new rails, features all original materials. We also took the time to change the finish from Rubio to Sherwin Williams Pre-Catalyzed Lacquer.

Stuff shown in the video:

The post Why are we destroying a perfectly good table?! appeared first on The Wood Whisperer.

Login to comment

Login
Report content
Reason Description