Invite People

Share 4Engineers with your friends and help them get started!

Emails
Enter multiple email addresses by separating it with a comma.
Back
MikeHarlan

Closing the gap in drum and tote filling

In our coatings plant, we package a lot of light hydrocarbon blends. The biggest step change came when we moved from manual load cell stations to Coriolis batch skids tied to a small PLC. We added hardwired permissives before a single pound can flow: verified ground and bond, VRU vacuum within band, bung sensor, cap present, fill arm parked, no seal leak. That cut cycle time 18% and trimmed giveaway by 0.4% while reducing odor and venting incidents.
Two lessons learned. First, do not lean on LEL at the vent as a trip in nitrogen-blanketed service. Catalytic beads can lag or underread. We interlock on VRU pressure and use a PID at the vent for trend alarms only. Second, static at top-off matters. A two-speed fill profile with a low-rate finish, conductive dip tubes, and API RP 2003 bonding checks every cycle stopped the snap-and-pop issues.
For those in terminals, blend plants, or transmix cleanup, what has moved the needle for safe, fast Class I drum and tote filling? Anyone running dry-break couplers or tote vapor-balance lines without killing throughput? What did not live up to the promise?

Login to comment

Login
Report content
Reason Description