Engineers in metal additive manufacturing are overloaded by manual documentation and spreadsheet hunting, leaving little time for problem-solving. The article argues for replacing reactive, spreadsheet-based workflows with a centralized digital quality backbone that automates documentation, unifies data, improves traceability, and shifts quality from post-mortems to prevention.
What parts of your AM workflow still live in spreadsheets, and what capabilities would a digital quality backbone need to replace them effectively?
The best engineers I meet are not short on knowledge. They’re short on time. They’re trapped in a loop of manual documentation, spreadsheet archaeology, and post-mortem investigations.